Princeton Economics Cycles

PEI Cycle High – 26 February 2007

Source: Barclay Leib, Len Wheeler, et al.

Although he has been much defamed, Martin Armstrong of Princeton Economic Institute did no doubt stumble upon a unique cycle in financial market analysis. He began with the simple procedure of adding up all the financial panics between 1683 and 1907, and dividing the 224 intervening years by the number of panics that he found, 26 of them to be precise. The result was an average duration between panics of approximately 8.6 years. Of note, 8.6 years also equals 3141 days, or the mathematical symbol of “pi” times 1000.Armstrong went on to do a great deal of further research into this preliminary “cycle,” noting that 6 individual 8.6 year cycles added together came to 51.6 years — or something akin to the famous Kondratieff cycle. He also noted that many of the 8.6 year periods represented shifts in public sentiment away from government control of the economy, and then subsequently back toward it when a “bust” cycle became overwhelming. He noted that “politics seemed to ebb and flow in harmony with the business cycle.”

Using the Crash of 1929 (1929.75) as his starting point, Armstrong was also amazed to find that his general 8.6 year rhythm worked in a remarkably prescient manner going forward in time — often almost to the day. We list these global business cycle dates on the table below, each cycle lasting almost exactly 8.6 years, and have added our own Elliott Wave labeling for those so inclined.

  • 1929.75: U.S. equity market crash — end to Wave I;
  • 1938.35: End of U.S. bear market — end to Wave II, beginning of 1 of III;
  • 1946.95: U.S. equity market high — end to Wave 1 of III;
  • 1955.55: U.S. equity market breaks the 1929 high — end to Wave 2 of III, beginning of 3 of III;
  • 1964:15: U.S. equity market high — end to Wave 3 of III;
  • 1972.75: U.S. equity market high — end to Wave 5 of III, beginning of protracted wave IV and inflationary spiral;
  • 1981.35: Last series of Fed tightening begin to squelch inflation, beginning the final descent of Wave IV into August 1982;
  • 1989.95: First global market to complete its Wave V topped on this day: Japan. End of Wave 1 of V elsewhere;
  • 1998.55: July 20, 1999 marked a significant high in both European and U.S. equities, preceding the August 1998 Russian debt crisis — the end of Wave 3 of V;
  • 2007.15: February 26, 2007
  • 2009.33: April 19, 2009
  • 2011.45: June 13, 2011

8.6 Year Global Business Cycle
PEI long term cycle

The last four major PEI cycle turns have been uncannily prescient, especially given how long ago they were prognosticated (back in the 1980s, I think.) But not all of them were direct hits:

  • The 1989.95 PEI major cycle top was predicted for Dec 12 1989. The Dow actually topped on that day and fell about 5%. Then re-rallied to a higher high on Jan 2 1990, 19 days later. That’s when the big drop came: -12%. Then the Dow re-rallied to an ever higher high by mid-July before dumping -22% into Oct.
  • The 1994.24 PEI major cycle bottom was predicted for Apr 1 1994. That was a direct hit. The Dow bottomed exactly on Apr 1 1994 after a 12% selloff. Then it rallied for another six years.
  • The 1998.55 PEI major cycle top was predicted for Jul 20 1998. That was also a direct hit. The Dow topped exactly on Jul 20 1998 and dropped -22% by Sept/Oct.
  • The 2002.85 PEI major cycle bottom was predicted for Nov 6 2002. The Dow bottomed on 10/10/02, nearly a month earlier. The next big cycle high is supposed to be Feb 26 2007, which the PEI predicts will be along the same lines as Jan 1990 and July 1998.

One of Armstrong’s last comments made in 2000:

“I view the world from a global correlation perspective and it just doesn’t seem possible to achieve a raging bull market in metals when stocks are the flavor of the month. Historically, bull markets are created when capital concentrates, and that focus is in the stock market for now. When that concentration breaks, capital will look around for the next great investment. That should be the commodity cycle between 2002-2007 and perhaps extend out as late as 2012. For now, the metals should make their final lows by 2002. Either way, they should be contrasted by a bubble top in stocks.”

S&P 500 market speculation until 2010

Source: S Drozdz, F Grummer, F Ruf and J Speth
Date: 29 April 2007

The information below is extracted from a paper () presented in March 2005. The authors have shown that log-period oscillations are present across various time scales. This can be seen in the first long term chart since 1800. The second chart shows the zoomed in rectangle for the period 1997-2002 with accelerating and decelerating lognormal functions. Note that both charts are log scaled.

The next stock market top is estimated to occur in around the years 2010-2011 as shown in the chart below. The period has two main components as shown by the thin lines. The first is the long term component accelerating towards 2010 and the second is the decelerating component from Sep 2001.

Sovereign Wealth Funds

Source: Wall Street Journal (Stephen Grocer, 29 Jan 2008)

Fund Country Founded Size ($ Billions)
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority and Corporation United Arab Emirates – Abu Dhabi 1976 875
Government Pension Fund – global Norway 1990 341
Government of Singapore Investment Corp. Singapore 1981 330
Brunei Investment Agency Brunei 1983 300
Various funds Saudi Arabia n/a 300
Kuwait Investment Authority Kuwait 1953 250
China Investment Corporation China 2007 200
Temasek Holdings Singapore 1974 159
Qatar Investment Authority Qatar 2005 40
Alaska Permanent Fund United States 1976 38
Future Generations Fund Russia 2004 30
Khazanah Nasional BHD Malaysia 1993 26
Korea Investment Corporation South Korea 2005 20
Dubai International Capital United Arab Emirates – Dubai 2004 12
Mubadala Development Company United Arab Emirates – Abu Dhabi 2002 10
Istithmar United Arab Emirates – Dubai 2003 4

Currency Traders’ Performance

Barclay Currency Traders Index

An equal weighted composite of managed programs that trade currency futures and/or cash forwards in the inter bank market. In 2016 there are 66 currency programs included in the index.

1980 1990 57.74% 2000 4.45% 2010 3.45%
1981 1991 10.94% 2001 2.71% 2011 2.25%
1982 1992 10.27% 2002 6.29% 2012 1.71%
1983 1993 -3.33% 2003 11.08% 2013 0.87%
1984 1994 -5.96% 2004 2.36% 2014 3.35%
1985 1995 11.49% 2005 -1.21% 2015 4.65%
1986 1996 6.69% 2006 -0.12% 2016 1.02%
1987 29.56% 1997 11.35% 2007 2.59%
1988 4.28% 1998 5.71% 2008 3.50%
1989 18.89% 1999 3.12% 2009 0.91%
Estimated YTD performance for 2016 calculated with reported data as of Aug-3-2016

Source: Barclays

At a Glance from Jan 1987

Compound Annual Return 6.65%
Sharpe Ratio 0.33
Worst Drawdown 15.26%
Correlation vs S&P 500 -0.02
Correlation vs US Bonds 0.12
Correlation vs World Bonds -0.02

The ‘ten commandments’ of trading

By Lewis Borsellino

In the 20 years I’ve been trading, I’ve discovered one truism that is valid whether you’re trading stocks, fixed income or futures: trading is 90% psychological. All the rest – technical analysis, trade execution, etc. – is the other 10%.

That’s not to say that technical analysis of the markets isn’t important. It’s vital. You can’t trade without a plan based on technical analysis that encompasses support and resistance, trend lines, moving averages, momentum, volatility and the like. But you can’t possibly execute that plan consistently if your mental game is off. That’s where the ‘ten commandments’ of trading come in.

1. Trade for success, not for money.

Your motivation should be first and foremost to make a well-executed trade. If money alone is your motivation you will severely limit your chance of success. Why? Because focusing on money will raise all kinds of emotional issues, from fear to greed. It will make you afraid of losses to the point that you will abandon your discipline. It will tempt you to trade too often, too large and with too much risk. Whereas if you focus on making solid, well-executed trades – even if the result is a losing trade that you exit quickly – you will reinforce your discipline and increase your trading potential.

2. Discipline is the one quality that all traders must possess above all others.

The ability to master your mind, your body and your emotions is the key to trading. The disciplined trader – regardless of profit or loss – comes back to trade another day. A great intellect, the ability to take on risk, or even a sense that you’re somehow ‘lucky’ mean nothing without discipline. For a trader, discipline means the ability to devise a trading plan, execute according to that plan, and to never deviate from that plan.

3. Know yourself.

Do you break out in a cold sweat at the mere thought of risking something – such as your own capital? Do you think of trading like ‘gambling,’ a long shot to make a million? Or can you handle risk in a disciplined fashion, knowing how much is ‘too much’ for both your capital and your constitution?

Trading is not for everyone. If risk makes you ill, on the one hand, or if taking a risk brings out the recklessness in you, then trading is probably not for you. But if you can handle risk with discipline, then perhaps you can find a vocation or avocation as a trader. Only you can answer that question.

4. Lose your ego.

No matter how much success you enjoy as a trader, you’ll never outsmart the market. If you think you can, you’re in for a very humbling experience. The market rules, always, and for everyone.

You need to silence your ego in order to listen to the market, to follow what your technical analysis is indicating – and not what your intellect (and your ego) think should happen. To trade effectively, you need to put yourself aside. At the same time, you cannot be so emotionally fragile that unprofitable trades shatter your confidence. Don’t be crushed by the market, but don’t ever think you’ve mastered it, either.

5. There’s no such thing as hoping, wishing or praying.

I’ve seen too many traders staring panic-stricken at the computer screen and begging the market to move their way. Why? Because they have lost their discipline and allowed what was a small loss to turn into a much bigger one. They keep hanging on, hoping, wishing and praying for things to turn around. The reality is on the screen. When the market hits your stop-loss level (the price at which you’ll cut your losses at a pre-determined level), get out.

6. Let your profits run and cut your losses quickly.

When the market goes against you and you hit your pre-determined stop, exit the trade. Period. Exit when the loss is a small one. Then reevaluate your strategy and execute a new trade. Keeping your losses small will keep you in the game. Profits take care of themselves, as long as you execute according to your plan. When you place a trade, know in advance where you’ll exit for a profit. When the market reaches that level, exit the position. If your technical analysis tells you the market still has some room to move, then scale out of the position. But execute according to your plan. Remember, you’ll never go broke taking a profit.

7. Know when to trade and when to wait.

Trade when your analysis, your system and your strategy say that you have a buy or sell to execute. If the market doesn’t have a clear direction, then wait on the sidelines until it does. Keep your mind on the market, but keep your money out of it.

8. Love your losers like you love your winners.

Losing trades will be your best teachers. When you have a losing trade, it’s because of some flaw in your analysis or your judgment. Or perhaps the market simply didn’t do what you thought it would. When you have a losing trade, something is out of sync with the market. Examine what went wrong – objectively – then adjust your thinking, if necessary, and enter the trade again.

9. After three losing trades in a row, take a break.

This is not the time to take on more risk, but rather to become extremely disciplined. Sit on the sidelines for a while. Watch the market. Clear your head. Re-evaluate your strategy, and then put on another trade. Losses can shake your confidence and tempt you to become emotional (fear/greed) But if you take a break, you can gather your wits and regain your composure more quickly than if you become very emotional and angry at yourself and the market.

10. The unbreakable rule.

You can break a rule and get away with it once in a while. But one day, the rules will break you. If you continually violate these ‘commandments’ of trading, you will eventually pay for it with your profits. That’s the unbreakable rule. If you have trouble with any of them, come back and read this one. Then read it again.

Trading and the second marshmallow

By John Piper

 One of the difficulties with trading is that the rules change as you progress. The novice must learn to cut losses and not much else matters at this stage. Once that rule is ingrained, it is down to running profits. But if you try and run profits at the ‘cut losses’ stage you will have a lot of problems.

Another of the difficulties is that many traders break the rules and win! But this can be disastrous, because the market is bound to catch you out if you follow the wrong rules. Trading has a logic of its own. If you allow losses to run, the logic is you will be wiped out. Over many different trades the market will exploit any weaknesses in either the trader or his/her system. Statistically a few ‘bad’ traders will do well for a while – but not in the long run.

1. Reduce position size to the point where you are comfortable.

It may seem odd that reducing position size is my number one idea for making more money, but it is so. Many traders put themselves under excess pressure, by doing so they are prone to make bad decisions and they lose money. So reduce position size and make more money!

2. Consider using option strategies – don’t limit your options!

Options have a lot of plus points, and have a part to play in your strategy.

3. Find a trading mentor.

Trading is a very difficult business. Not least because it is a zero sum game. NO, cancel that – it is a negative sum game, because every time you enter the game you pay commission, not to mention all the other expenses involved, price feeds, computers, software, etc, etc. With futures, the amount every winner wins is paid for by all the losers, but all participants pay commissions and the other costs. So in aggregate it’s a negative pot. It’s no surprise so many lose.

If you need help with your trading, find someone who has experience to help you. Ideally a local trader – many are prepared to help because trading is a fairly dry business with little meaningful human contact. Otherwise you may need to find a professional who is willing to help but he may well expect to charge a fee. I do this myself, but your best bet is to try and find someone who is local to you.

4. Use stops which have some meaning.

Not all traders use stops and by not using stops everything becomes a lot simpler because you get wiped out fairly quickly. Actually that is not totally true but it is true for some, if not many. But if you are using an approach which does utilize stops then try and ensure your stops have some significance, otherwise you tend to be throwing money away.

5. Understand the logic of your trading approach.

Every approach to the market involves risk. As a trader, you must control risk, just as a tightrope walker learns to live with imbalance. Understand the logic of your approach and the risks you are taking, because that risk will come home to roost. In one sense the market is a generator of random sequences, especially if you follow a precise algorithm. If you or your approach has a weakness the market will find it in one of those random sequences.

6. Let profits run – wait for the second marshmallow!

Unless you let your profits run you will never cover your losses, let alone come out on top. You must also cut your losses. Most traders learn to cut losses quite easily but have trouble learning to run profits. This is not surprising. Cutting losses is an active function requiring careful monitoring of what is happening – it requires action. Running profits, in contrast, requires inaction, and doing nothing can be tough. In modern society we are used to quick gratification. We want our goodies and we want them now. The same goes for trading profits: once you see them, you want them – but you cannot have them if you want to let profits run.

The book Emotional Intelligence describes an experiment in which a child is left in a room with a marshmallow and told that if he does not eat it, he will receive a second marhshmallow. Apparently this simple test is a far better guide to success than any number of intelligence tests. It is also exactly what traders must do if they want to let profits run, so don’t eat that marshmallow and you will get two!

7. Be selective

There are so many keys to success but I feel this is the one that separates those who make lots of money from those who just get by.

8. Don’t predict.

Market action is not predictable. A trader does not predict action – he takes calculated risks. He risks a little to make a lot.

9. Don’t panic.

This is critical. Panic is mother to losses. Part of this is not putting yourself under undue pressure. The more relaxed you are, the less likely you are to panic.

10. Be humble – big egos cost a lot to run!

A person who is full of himself has no room for anything else: he will not listen, or learn. A trader who is not humble may not listen to the market and will get wiped out. I suspect we have all heard stories of macho traders who take on the market and get turned into mincemeat. I believe humility is an essential for trading success.

Engaging The Great Humiliator

By Ken Fisher

 1. Engage The Great Humiliator without ending up humiliated by it.

The market is effectively a near living, near spiritual entity that exists for one goal and one goal only – to embarrass as many people as possible for as many dollars as possible for as long a time period as possible. And it is really effective at it. It wants to humiliate you, me and everyone else. It wants to humiliate Republicans and Democrats and Tories. It is an equal opportunity humiliator. Your goal is to engage The Great Humiliator without ending up humiliated by it.

2. Never forget – you are really Fred Flintstone.

If you always remember you have a stone age mind genetically trying to deal with post-industrial revolution problems, you will better understand your cognitive difficulties in seeing the market correctly. We got our brains from our ancestors and they are both genetically identical to those that existed before markets did, but also the ways we process information are almost identical to they way information was processed thousands of years ago. When you think of a tough stock market problem in terms of how would a stone age person think of this, it takes you to rudimentary evolutionary psychology, which is closely linked to behavioral finance and leads quickly to being able to see yourself better and better understand your problem.

3. The Pros are always wrong.

For decades people have presumed that the little guy is wrong and the sophisticated pro is more likely to be right. The concept is cute but is inconsistent with finance theory. The reality is that professional consensus is always wrong. Why?

The market is a discounter of all known information. That is core finance theory. Everyone has information, but on average professionals have a lot more access to information than normal people. Professionals as a group have access to all essentially known information. So, if you can figure out what professionals as a group believe will happen you know what has been discounted into current pricing from all known information and therefore cannot happen. It is theoretically and empirically perfect.

The pros as a group are a perfect guide to what won’t happen. Knowing what won’t happen doesn’t tell you what will but eliminates a big part of the possibility spectrum and gives you a leg up on figuring out what may happen.

4. Nothing works all the time.

Sometimes growth is hot. Sometimes it’s not. Sometimes value leads. Sometimes small caps do. Sometimes foreign stocks lead and sometimes domestic stocks do.

Investors have layered their thought processes on top of thousands of years of a prior process we did well that we now call collecting. Thousands of years ago people collected food, stone points for spears, firewood and much more. Now people collect for fun because our brains are adept at it. Collectors collect consistent with their biases and their access to information and or stuff. Their collections tell you more about who they are than the stuff.

In equities they collect in categories consistent with their biases, like value, growth, etc…. The value guy and growth guy both think their categories are basically and permanently better. But in the long run they all end up with almost exactly identical average annualized returns, and must – it is core to how capitalism’s pricing mechanism works.

5. Most investors will go to hell or die not understanding why.

If you don’t fathom number 4, above, and actually believe that some category of equities is basically better or worse than others, you are not alone. Most investors, being collectors, believe that, including most professionals, most of whom are collectors.

But to say some equity category is basically better permanently is to say that you either disbelieve in capitalism, in which case you are sure destined to hell, or that you don’t fully fathom its pricing mechanism.

In the long term supply is much more powerful in setting securities prices than demand and the only marginal costs of new supply are distribution. All other costs can be amortized over large unit volume to drive them to zero if the price of the equities is high enough. What that means is that as soon as investment bankers see any excess demand for any equity category they busily go about the process of starting to create new supply to meet it. To the extent they do so, which may take some time, they pull that category’s pricing back into line with all other categories. When you look at 30 year average annual returns of equity categories they are all essentially identical and always will be. It is core finance theory.

6. Heroes are myths.

The great investors of the past were mostly innovators, but because they were if they were alive today they wouldn’t do it now the way they did it then. That was then; this is now. Almost everything from the past is obsolete now.

Think of it like being Intel. If Intel made semiconductors now like it did 15 years ago, it would be broke. You have to keep learning, changing, adapting and adopting the latest and newest capability. If you don’t you will get left behind. If you don’t believe that, watch me leave you behind. Hence it is a mistake to say things like, “I want to be an investor like Ben Graham (or any past guru) was” – because they wouldn’t do it like they did themselves – now.

7. Pray to The Luck God.

In behavioral finance theory the ultimate sin is accumulating pride and shunning regret. Accumulating pride is a process that associates success with skill or repeatability. Shunning regret associates failure with bad luck or victimization. Accumulating pride and shunning regret is something people have done in our normal lives for more than 25,000 years, since Homo Sapiens first walked as modern man. It motivates us to keep trying in non-financial activities and is surely good.

But in financial activities it cause us to become overconfident and enter into transactions for which we have no particular training, background, experience or special knowledge and when we enter into overconfident decisions we get bad luck – we become unlucky.

To become lucky reverse the process and learn to shun pride and accumulate regret. Then you assume success was materially luck, not skill and not particularly repeatable. You assume failure was not bad luck or victimization but your own lack of skill and hence mandating introspective lessons to self-improve. When you do that you make less overconfident decisions and become fundamentally lucky instead of unlucky. This is just using finance theory to get lucky.

8. Market timing is terrible unless you time it right.

Most of the time the market rises. Unless it is a real bear market, all attempts at market timing backfire and become very costly. But when you actually encounter a real bear market, recognizing it and taking corrective actions is near life saving. But it is hard to do because you have to build and maintain the skills for so doing while not deploying them for years and sometimes many years during bull markets. Usually people who don’t use skills for a long time eventually lose them. Not very many folks can do this.

9. A bear is bullheaded until you can’t bear it.

The change in psychology that is the sign of a shift from a bull market to a bear market is that early in a bear market downdrafts are met with increased optimism. In a bull market, because the market has been rising more than folks expected, every correction is short, sharp and strong and met with near hysteria from panicky investors who fear the bull markets up-move will be largely retraced on the down side. They didn’t expect or understand the up-move so they fear wild stories about things that could make it vanish.

But after a long bull market they have learned to always buy the break, and that long-term investors always come out ahead. And then as the market drops they see it as an opportunity and become more optimistic (which you can measure by watching professional investor sentiment), and spend their cash, using up their spare liquidity and leaving none to support stocks later.

10. When you get really good: quit.

Kids aren’t so good as investors. They don’t know anything yet. They are impulsive and have very short senses of time. Old investors aren’t very good either. They get rigid and can’t change with the winds. The best investors get best between the ages of about 35, after they’ve gotten some real experience, and peak by about 60 or maybe even a little earlier, by which time they start slowing down.

Different people are different but I’ve never seen a really old investor who hadn’t pretty well lost most of his prior skill set. Part of what makes a great investor is his ability to adapt but when you get too old you lose that ability. So if you’ve been really good, and hit it really well, plan in advance when to quit and when you get there, just stop making decisions. Let go.

The investing methods of Warren Buffett

By Lawrence Cunningham

 1. Don’t be the patsy.

If you cannot invest intelligently, the best way to own common stocks is through an index fund that charges minimal fees. Those doing so will beat the net results (after fees and expenses) enjoyed by the great majority of investment professionals. As they say in poker, ‘If you’ve been in the game 30 minutes and you don’t know who the patsy is, you’re the patsy’.

2. Operate as a business analyst.

Do not pay attention to market action, macroeconomic action, or even securities action. Concentrate on evaluating businesses.

3. Look for a big moat.

Look for businesses with favorable long term prospects, whose earnings are virtually certain to be materially higher 5, 10, 20 years from now.

4. Exploit Mr. Market.

Market prices gyrate around business value, much as a moody manic depressive swings from euphoria to gloom when things are neither that good nor that bad. The market gives you a price, which is what you pay, while the business gives you value and that is what you own. Take advantage of these market mis-pricings, but don’t let them take advantage of you.

5. Insist on a margin of safety.

The difference between the price you pay and the value you get is the margin of safety. The thicker, the better. Berkshire’s purchases of the Washington Post Company in 1973-74 offered a very thick margin of safety (price about 1/5 of value).

6. Buy at a reasonable price.

Bargain hunting can lead to purchases that don’t give long-lasting value; buying at frenzied prices will lead to purchases that give very little value at all. It is better to buy a great business at fair price than a fair business at great price.

7. Know your limits.

Avoid investment targets that are outside your circle of competence. You don’t have to be an expert on every company or even many – only those within your circle of competence. The size of the circle is not very important; knowing its boundaries, however, is vital.

8. Invest with ‘sons-in-law’.

Invest only with people you like, trust and admire – people you’d be happy to have your daughter marry.

9. Only a few will meet these standards.

When you see one, buy a meaningful amount of its stock. Don’t worry so much about whether you end up diversified or not. If you get the one big thing, that is better than a dozen mediocre things.

10. Avoid gin rummy behavior.

This is the opposite of possibly the most foolish of all Wall Street maxims: ‘You can’t go broke taking a profit’. Imagine as a stockholder that you own the business and hold it the way you would if you owned and ran the whole thing. If you aren’t willing to own a stock for 10 years, don’t even think about owning it for 10 minutes.